The recent June 5th brought out more than a tiny number of people to recognize the Oregon State Penintiery show on the anniversary of its performance — June 5, 1982 — rather than on the date given by the old bootleg tape. Because the bootleg was one of the mostly widely held Garcia recordings in the CD era, the spurious date of May 5, 1982 –imagine bootleggers getting something wrong!– has been persistent and hard to uproot. Bad information crowds out the good even years after the latter has been established with 100-ε% certainty. Certainly the last decade of politics has demonstrated the dark underbelly of the availability heuristic, as the simple (but relentless) repetition of untruth persuades people to believe it. (Note to self: Kahneman 2011, 62, 66, 67).
And it is now 100% established that May 5, 1982 is incorrect, and June 5, 1982 is correct. latter is now the case here. I first established the correct date of June 5th based on the tour itinerary hidden in the GD Archives at UCSC. I learned more in a piece about Steve Stilling, the OSP prisoner who put the Garcia-Kahn event and a number of other notable gigs on. Dick Latvala’s Scrapbooks supplied a picture of the event from a local newspaper! Most of this is pinned at Jerrybase, natch. But there is really no doubt about this, beyond the epsilon (ε) I always reserve on metaphysical grounds
So I want to express my appreciation not only for those who are open to updating their beliefs about this sort of thing, but for those who endeavor to use accurate information, even in relatively casual conversation, when it comes to Jerry Garcia’s musical life and activities and the rest of the stuff we are passionate about.
Accuracy matters, even in this “hobby” space, this “amateur” space which, Steve Silberman reminded us years back in one of the Taping Compendiums, simply means “lover” or “lover of”. I am fully bought-in to Umberto Eco’s view that we make lists in a vain attempt to tame infinity in a vain attempt to live forever — together. Any efforts along these lines should never be described with the pejorative “obsession”, IMO. I greatly prefer the label “passion”. And why not? We are dying, after all! We’ve got work to do!
I get that not everyone cares, and I am not going to try to police their usages … too much. Maybe a nudge, providing the correct information. Maybe an implicit plea for them to use the correct information as much as possible, not because they care, but because I (and lots of us) care. In that specific form of community known as culture, pinning down our past helps us live together in the present and feel just a little calmer about the future, since at least this piece of infinity has been tamed.
Comments
6 responses to “On Accuracy”
Agree in spirit, to a degree… If you get confused, as they say.
Oh dear
"anniversary of its performance — June 5, 1982 — "
"June 6, 1982 is correct"
LOL – awesome. Fixed. Thank you!
Thanks for this Joe. Now I know why I have a spreadsheet of every Dead tape I listen to and regret not having starting a Jerry band one! Worried I'll run out of road before I've heard them all (same goes for Dylan's, which I also have an ongoing record of…). I am trying to tame infinity! He who is not busy being born is busy dying, indeed!
Yeah!!! All laudable schemes to be involved in.
Let me go ahead and note that I think the collective position in regards to accuracy in recordings metadata has eroded. That is: we are getting a little loose with data integrity, IMO. I will continue to try to make sure that Jerrybase has things as right as I can. Comments and corrections *always* welcome!